Civil Society and Professionals Could Face Suppression Under Proposed Security Bill, Speakers Warn

Representatives of the National Professional and Civil Front have criticised a proposed government security bill, claiming it could be used to restrict civil society organisations, professionals, religious leaders and journalists who speak out against government actions.

Speaking at a media briefing in Colombo, medical specialist Dr. Chamal Sanjeewa argued that the proposed legislation could grant authorities broad powers to arrest individuals considered threats to the state. He also raised concerns about the possibility of detention under detention orders without being brought before a court.

Dr. Sanjeewa said the government had previously pledged to abolish the Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA), but was now introducing legislation that critics believe could be used to protect the government from criticism.

He warned that unclear provisions in the proposed bill could create opportunities for the law to be applied against individuals expressing dissent, including journalists and those highlighting alleged government shortcomings.

Dr. Sanjeewa also criticised the government’s handling of health-sector issues, claiming that progress in medicine regulation and distribution had been inadequate despite two years in office. He further alleged that the proposed legislation was intended to suppress public opposition to the government.

He also referred to attempts by a municipal council to remove Buddhist monks participating in a satyagraha protest.

Civil activist Thusitha Perera, who also addressed the briefing, said the proposed legislation could adversely affect civil society activists and professionals, potentially undermining their rights and professional freedoms.

Meanwhile, Dr. Seneth Gajasinha criticised what he described as the government’s reliance on executive power to address public grievances. He suggested that the government’s response reflected its failure to address the issues facing the public.

The speakers called attention to the potential implications of the proposed legislation for civil liberties, professional rights and freedom of expression.